![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||||
| Engine Engine/transmission and other oily matters |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2007
Car: '95 W124 E220, '96 W124 E320 Cabriolet
Posts: 111
|
w124 e220 to 230k engine swap, (m111)
i need some help with the theory behind this conversion. Background: i currently have a '96 E220 convertible, it has the m111 2.2 engine with 4speed auto box. (on a side note it has: Jenhert install, exhaust system, wald bodykit, new wings, full paintjob/rust removal, minor engine work, remote engine start/uprated alarm, Bilstein b12 suspension, remote boot release, front fogs, and im sure a few other bits i forgot) The aim I want to change the engine for a m111 2.3L komp engine (post 2000) from possibly a clk or something similar. Then to this engine i will install the asp racing pulley kit, taking it to around 240bhp. The issue I was speaking about this conversion with the mechanic and he (and now i) are wondering whether the ecu (from the donor) will cause any immobilastion issues. We are in disagreement here, he thinks that the ecu will effectively immobilise the engine because it will require the key from the donor. I dont think that it will cause a problem personally, but then again hes a professional with 20year with merc under his belt and im not really, lol. I was assuming that i would only really have to have the engine, wiring loom, ecu. Also would the 4sp autobox be ok for this setup? i understand that the 4sp box is stronger than the 5speed but will it be good enough. also if i were to change it to the trip-tronic setup what would it involve. Many thanks in advance, ps. i will be posting pictures of both the cabriolet and the coupe soon. i am also planning a uprated intercooler system and brakes off a larger merc. i have not looked into the brakes properly yet, want to get the power sorted first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Brighton
Car: BMW E39 525 Diesel Touring
Posts: 3,075
|
Lots of hard work. Why not put an M104 3.2 in there? Standard W124 engine, all bits are available over the counter or via a breaker
The M104 has more power and will be a much smoother, 6-pot engine. If you want to make it a little different fit the M104 with an aftermarket ECU and dump the factory loom & ECU I suspect E320 brakes will be fine for whatever you want to do Nick Froome the independent Mercedes Estate specialists |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Perth, Scotland
Car: W204 C200CDI Estate
Posts: 14,619
|
In the later compressor M111 2.3L engined cars the main engine ECU " talks " to the ignition key unit and possibly to the 5 speed autobox ECU. Without the presence of these units and their associated wiring I'm not sure the engine will run. There may well be ways of fooling the main engine ECU with suitable "dummy" inputs" but how exactly you would go about that I don't know. Your problem is that you are trying to mate up components from 2 different electronic generations of model. The engine will fit-- but that's about it sorry.
__________________
Cheers Graeme W204 C200CDI Estate Last edited by grober; 03-09-2011 at 10:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Threadstarter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Car: '95 W124 E220, '96 W124 E320 Cabriolet
Posts: 111
|
Grobber, i guess he was right then.
Nick: that was the original plan to be honest, the m104 coupled with a TT twin turbo kit when i can find one. The conversion itself would take place in a few months. just getting everything organised now so when i get the money i can start working again. Assuming i do go down the m104 route, what would i need to swap
Is there anything else? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Brighton
Car: BMW E39 525 Diesel Touring
Posts: 3,075
|
I would expect the diff to be a different ratio on the 320. The diff also varies with 4-speed / 5-speed auto. There are a few ratios to choose from so break out the calculator and work out what you want for rpm / mph for your usage
If you go for a TT setup you are into lots of work with fuelling, compression ratio, etc Personally, if I were going to go to all this trouble I'd find a wrecked 500SL and build something unique Nick Froome the independent Mercedes Estate specialists |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Threadstarter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Car: '95 W124 E220, '96 W124 E320 Cabriolet
Posts: 111
|
The cabriolet been in the family for over 10 years and it was my dads, so im not looking to change the actuall car, just improve the engine.
I was thinking putting about putting to 500 engine in it,but i just got new wings and suspension etc.. and if i get a 500 engine, it will need new wings, different front suspension and then respraying the wings, etc... and i dont really want to go through all that again. The ecu, enigne, wiring, rad and tranny i could change over in 2-3 days. that is based of the fact that i just finished a volvo 2.4 turbo in 1day (that was complete engine swap, and tranny, turbo, rad, driveshafts, and wiring.) Im really not bothered about the amount of work, i enjoy it. and even if it takes a few weeks doesnt matter, because i got the volvo to drive around in. With the TT setup, i understand i will have to change the fueling system (was looking at additional injectors and a stand alone fuel managemnt system), also will need to shorthen the conrods and alter the throttle body, might use forged pistons. I know its alot of work but i think it will be worth it in the long run. Does anybody know where i can get the TT kit from? anyone got one they want to sell?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Brighton
Car: BMW E39 525 Diesel Touring
Posts: 3,075
|
The 500E wings are to cover the bigger wheels on that car. If you're happy to run a 320 Twin Turbo on standard wheels, why not a 500?
It'd be interesting to know the weight difference between an M104, M104 Twin Turbo and a 500 V8 engine. I suspect the 500 would be no heavier that a 320 TT and, because it has a shorter block, the weight would be further back in the car The one disadvantage the 320 has over the 220 is that it's 100 Kg heavier - and all that extra weight sits ahead of the front axle line The 500 has a stronger gearbox as well Nick Froome the independent Mercedes Estate specialists |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,242
|
This thread brings back memories! lol. If I wanted to create something different and unique, it'd be putting a M117 5.6 32v engine in there along with the gearbox and tranny. Not too many 124's left with that set up now.
Back to your dilemma, I'd put in a M104 3.6 L from an early donor C36 without the electronic mileage on the dash. Then you'll have 6 sweet cylinders pushing out 270 horses, plus it'll still look like a factory install. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Threadstarter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Car: '95 W124 E220, '96 W124 E320 Cabriolet
Posts: 111
|
Quote:
Nick: wont a 3.2TT be quicker than a 500? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Midlands
Car: 1994 E320 Coupe, 2011 Golf bluemotion 2.0tdi GT Tech(could they put any more letters on the boot?)
Posts: 2,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2010
Car: Mercedes W210 E320cdi, 190E 2.5-16, Allard, Citroen SM, Range Rover and Alpina B10
Posts: 3,551
|
The 500 would be a great relaxing engine with oodles of torque low down and a very nice rumble.
Far more in keeping with the car. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,242
|
I think the 3.2TT will be as quick as a 500 (talking about a 500E here) from a standing start, but i think its after the 80mph mark, the 500E will leave the 3.2TT for dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Brighton
Car: BMW E39 525 Diesel Touring
Posts: 3,075
|
Also, fairly high up in the "Things You Never Hear People Say" Top Ten is:
"I fitted a Twin Turbo kit to my 320 and it ran perfectly from the first turn of the key, never gave me a moments trouble, fuelling was spot-on and the original management system coped perfectly!" Nick Froome the independent Mercedes Estate specialists |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to bolide For This Useful Post: | carat 3.6 amg (04-09-2011) |
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore MB Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Gods own county
Car: Mercedes CLK 230 Kompressor Sport
Posts: 6,275
|
A pre facelift 230k would be an easier option less sophisticated ECU so much more configurable. You won't manage 240bhp with the ASP pulley alone been there and done that one the best you can get with a pulley swap is about 231 bhp and then you have to upgrade the intercooler. My 230k has Brabus K1 tuning which consists upgraded pulley larger intercooler etc see HERE with a few other tasty mods you can just squeeze above 230 bhp, I then went into a performance head and bigger valves etc and now running around 270 ish bhp
Good luck with the conversion will be nice when done
__________________
MB Club Yorkshire/Midlands/Lincs/Lancs Curry nights Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass, It's about learning to dance in the rain |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Over here, sometimes over there
Car: 1994 Mercedes C180 classic
Posts: 5,935
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| 230k, e220, engine, m111, swap, w124 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|